Dishonesty after Ivey – a material change or subtle shift?

Jonathan Fisher QC explores the meaning of the new test for dishonesty in criminal law following the decision in Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67, considering the similarities and differences between the old and new test. Has the decision narrowed the use of expert evidence or can it still be used in the objective limb, thereby rendering the change minimal?

RELATED POSTS
December 10, 2020|BY BLLFinancial sanctions and the anti-money laundering regime

Anita Clifford and Ariana Caines discuss financial sanctions and the anti-money laundering regime.

September 11, 2020|BY Ariana CainesRegulatory Cases and Criminal Benefit

In this Webinar Ariana Caines discusses regulatory cases and criminal benefit.

July 23, 2020|BY Jonathan Fisher QCMLRO Masterclass with Jonathan Fisher QC

Jonathan Fisher QC discusses the gaps in professional training guidance for AML compliance, providing practical...